Episodes

Gallup has 49% of US workers saying they have never used AI at work — never, not rarely — while Gartner predicts that by 2028, 75% of employees will rely on chatbots for internal communications. Jenni’s response to holding those two numbers next to each other is a laugh over her cup of tea, because she is still talking to organizations running fifteen SharePoint sites that cannot talk to one another. Around that sit two stories about leadership doing the harder thing: IBM tripling entry-level hiring by rewriting junior roles rather than cutting them, and Korn Ferry’s finding that Friday office attendance has collapsed to 12.4% even at companies that mandated five days back — which Chuck reframes as a leadership engagement problem, not an employee one.

A CIPD evidence review Rob Briner surfaced reaches an uncomfortable verdict: there is no consensus on what organizational culture is, no reliable way to measure it, and no good evidence that culture change programs work. At best, culture is a description of behavior rather than a cause of it. Jenni is firmly in agreement and wants behavior change programs to replace culture workshops; Chuck thinks the profession may be overthinking it, because everyone knows what a broken culture feels like, and lands on a weather analogy that gives the episode its most useful distinction. Around that, Jenni brings Nick Bloom’s data on company age and working from home, Stephen Waddington on the 92% of corporate value that is now intangible, and a Harvard Business Review study finding AI intensifies work rather than reducing it — plus Chuck’s new entry in the workplace lexicon, job hugging.

Home Depot told corporate employees to be back in the office five days a week from April 6, which would be ordinary corporate news except the company announced the same mandate in January 2025. Jenni’s read is that repeating an announcement is a credibility problem, not a communication one — twelve months passed with no consequences for anyone who ignored it. Chuck lines up four stories about the distance between what organizations say and what they fund: Home Depot’s second RTO mandate paired with 800 layoffs, Section’s finding that only 10% of knowledge workers are AI-proficient while half believe they are, Korn Ferry’s data on chief communications officers clearing $1 million while a third have no AI approach, and the Achievers report where only one in four employees feel appreciated and 34% are actively job hunting.

The episode opens on a question Chuck could not answer for a tech vendor who asked him which industry events are worth attending, and the honest answer — nothing outside what he and Jenni are already running — sets up an hour about institutions that have stopped doing the work. Shel Holtz’s open letter argues PRSA’s own code of ethics does not merely permit it to speak on the Minneapolis ICE operations but demands it, and Chuck’s position is that neutrality and silence are both decisions, both privileges and, often, both cowardly. Harvard Business Review makes the case for getting off the transformation treadmill by fixing the system rather than the symptom. Edelman’s 26th Trust Barometer reports 70% hesitant or unwilling to trust someone different from them, and gets a rougher reception than any story this year. And Gartner’s nine predictions for 2026 give Chuck the chance to start what he calls trend shaming.

Chuck opens with the thing he calls both his favorite and least favorite topic: a group of Minnesota-based CEOs — 3M, Best Buy, General Mills, Medtronic, Target, UnitedHealth Group — signing an open letter calling for immediate de-escalation after the Minneapolis shootings, while their own employees push for something considerably stronger. His verdict is that a row of logos on a letter is not a stand. From there it is four stories about AI and workplace change: Dropbox arguing that AI can rescue meetings, a Pearson study putting trillions of GDP upside behind employee training rather than tool-buying, Amazon’s 16,000 layoffs surfacing through a calendar invite titled “Send Project Dawn Email”, and Anthropic destroying print books to build training data. The through line is the one Chuck borrows from Rebecca Hinds: AI amplifies whatever already exists in an organization, the dysfunction included.

Millennials were asked what drives their disengagement and gave a one-line answer: “my leader doesn’t know me and doesn’t care to know me.” Chuck’s response sets the tone for the whole episode — it does not matter whether leaders privately care, because if that is how employees feel, that is the truth. Jenni breaks her own format and brings five stories instead of four, and they line up into a single argument about the distance between what leadership believes about its own organization and what everybody below them experiences: 60% millennial disengagement, Citigroup’s “we are not graded on effort” memo, a 40-point culture gap between the C-suite and entry level, Gallup’s span of control climbing to 12.1 direct reports, and a satisfaction gap on change communication that has widened from 13% to 30% in four years.

Amazon has a name for employees whose median time in the building is under four hours a day: low-time badgers. Jenni’s response is the argument of the whole episode — as long as the work gets done, who cares what kind of badger you are. Chuck lines up five stories about a workplace quietly tightening its grip: the death of happy hour, Amazon’s prove-it performance reviews and badge tracking, a UKG study of 8,200 frontline workers where 76% reported burnout, McKinsey’s claim that leaders rather than employees are the bottleneck on AI, and the argument that automating busywork removes the only recovery time most people had.

Chuck and Jenni open 2026 with a list of the leadership and comms habits that should have stayed in 2025. A Forbes piece argues employee happiness predicts stock performance — Jenni’s response is that what it actually measures is the baseline of leadership. Her own read of the year’s trends leads to a question about whether “internal communication” still describes the job. A LinkedIn debate asks whether buzzwords are harmful or occasionally useful, and Chuck disagrees with the author. And the research behind the open-plan office finds face-to-face interaction down 70% and the square footage per employee down by roughly the same — which Chuck argues was always the actual point.

Closing out 2025 with 25 hours and 41 minutes of Frequency behind them, Chuck Gose and Jenni Field count down the 10 themes that defined the year in work, leadership, and internal communication, then share five AI-generated predictions for what 2026 might bring.

Chuck Gose and Jenni Field swap festive traditions — Festivus lunches versus Icelandic book-and-hot-chocolate nights — before digging into new research on psychological safety as a strategic resource, a LinkedIn debate on strategy versus plans in internal comms, Leesman’s hybrid work “rhythms” data, and a pointed disagreement over whether AI anxiety is really just ordinary change anxiety.

Chuck Gose plugs the iCology mentorship program and settles the “is Die Hard a Christmas movie” debate before Jenni Field takes the wheel on a report-heavy week: the UK Government’s RESIST framework for misinformation, new wellbeing data from Reward Gateway, a Gallup event on UK disengagement, and a “human work” model from Fauna and CultureCon.