Jenni and Chuck work through why the math doesn't map. Chuck's question — are we confusing respect for the content (emails, intranet posts) with respect for the function (strategic advisory, culture stewardship) — points at something the profession keeps stepping around. If 70% of IC teams can't show what they're doing, what exactly is being respected?
Jenni's read: this is almost entirely a survey about channels and content, not about strategic influence. And that says everything about where the profession is stuck.
https://www.oak.com/newsroom/new-research-reveals-credibility-gap-in-internal-comms-94-say-its-respected-but-only-30-can-prove-business-impact/
